Powered by Caffeine

.:. fuck decaf .:.

caffinated meanderings of friends of passion


contributors
clb, tdm, rj, pf, lp, rc, jw, bm, sr, jv, aw, pw, se, fy, .:.
contributor help
contributor login
.:.

30.4.06

Where is my gun?


A small rant. The province and city (Toronto) have announced a faith-based anti-gang initiative call "Down With Guns". It's a coalition of Christian Churches who will (probably with Provincial and City money), try to bully little kids into going to boring and useless meetings where they will be told Christians shouldn't use guns. My mouth hangs open in stunned awe at the waste of time, money and resources. The (small) problem Toronto has with gun violence can be directly attributed to the slashing of assistance and social programs for Single Mothers by the Harris Government ten years ago. Dammit, re-establish the social safety net so the single moms don't have to work 3 jobs, get the extra-circular programs back in the schools, and stop treating poor teenage kids like dirt. Oh and by the way, stop treating poor teenage black kids like less than dirt.

25.4.06

toMarket Inc.

Bumped into one of these yesterday: http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,53795,00.html

The Wired article is from 2002, and honestly, I've probably taken a cab in TO approx. 1000 times since then. First time I've seen one.

Apologies for the lame muzac soundtrack: http://www.tomarket.ca/

The brand in the cab was mega pass or multi pass which doesn't pull up related info on google.

The irony? The ad it decided to show me was selling an SUV. But I was in a cab - did it think i wanted to buy a car instead? Once the ad started, I couldn't turn it off, or pick something more interesting.

24.4.06

Creating the Jobs We Want

From Dave Pollard's How to Save the World

This piece is a follow-up to the diagram below - how and why to live in the maginalized ring. Click the diagram, one of Dave's core models, to read about the myths of civilization (what we're sold to keep us in line), and the alternatives (myths in the making perhaps).

While local purchasing communities may not really work as naively as Dave and other bloggers have outlined, I believe that taking gross responsibility over one's own footprint in time and space and in civilization can be practical and rewarding.

22.4.06

Living On The Edge

Where are you? Where would you rather be? How will you get there?

I'm from the outer ring. I've traveled through into the light green ring, and hovered for years in the orange. But I retain the values and perspective from the marginalized outer ring. How to change the world? Through the infusion of outer values into the center.


From Dave Pollard's "How to Save the World"

11.4.06

trivia champs

 
 
 

8.4.06

avalanches and chaos theory

Thoughts from the Frontline

photo from Japan


Imagine, Buchanan says, dropping one grain of sand after another onto a table. A pile soon develops. Eventually, just one grain starts an avalanche. Most of the time it is a small one, but sometimes it builds up and it seems like one whole side of the pile slides down to the bottom.

Well, in 1987 three physicists named Per Bak, Chao Tang and Kurt Weisenfeld began to play the sandpile game in their lab at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York. Now, actually piling up one grain of sand at a time is a slow process, so they wrote a computer program to do it. Not as much fun, but a whole lot faster. Not that they really cared about sandpiles. They were more interested in what are called nonequilibrium systems.

They learned some interesting things. What is the typical size of an avalanche? After a huge number of tests with millions of grains of sand, they found out that there is no typical number. "Some involved a single grain; others, ten, a hundred or a thousand. Still others were pile-wide cataclysms involving millions that brought nearly the whole mountain down. At any time, literally anything, it seemed, might be just about to occur."

It was indeed completely chaotic in its unpredictability. Now, let's read this next paragraph slowly. It is important, as it creates a mental image that helps me understand the organization of the financial markets and the world economy. (emphasis mine)

'To find out why [such unpredictability] should show up in their sandpile game, Bak and colleagues next played a trick with their computer. Imagine peering down on the pile from above, and coloring it in according to its steepness. Where it is relatively flat and stable, color it green; where steep and, in avalanche terms, 'ready to go,' color it red. What do you see? They found that at the outset the pile looked mostly green, but that, as the pile grew, the green became infiltrated with ever more red. With more grains, the scattering of red danger spots grew until a dense skeleton of instability ran through the pile. Here then was a clue to its peculiar behavior: a grain falling on a red spot can, by domino-like action, cause sliding at other nearby red spots. If the red network was sparse, and all trouble spots were well isolated one from the other, then a single grain could have only limited repercussions. But when the red spots come to riddle the pile, the consequences of the next grain become fiendishly unpredictable. It might trigger only a few tumblings, or it might instead set off a cataclysmic chain reaction involving millions. The sandpile seemed to have configured itself into a hypersensitive and peculiarly unstable condition in which the next falling grain could trigger a response of any size whatsoever.'

[CLB: The whole article this was clipped from is worth a read and a few thoughts: [stock market crashes?]]

5.4.06

Naming on a global scale - part 2

On January 20, 2006, I posted here “Naming on a global scale”. I’ve since realized that as nice as it is to have a globally unique name (or close to globally unique) on the Net, such a name isn’t all that great “in real life” unless you’re socially known by that name! I’ve been posting as “felicopter”, a name I’d been thrilled to find was almost entirely undiscovered by others, but few people who know me are aware of that name because it’s recent and not used much in general. (If I had a nickname by which I was well known, that might have been suitable, but I don’t.) So lately when I’ve met fellow posters in this blog, I’ve had to explicitly tell them that I post as “felicopter”.

So I’m switching to my third name for posting in this blog! I started as rohancat, then felicopter, and now I’ll be Rohan Jayasekera, which is my “real name”. It hadn’t occurred to me that I could reasonably do that because there are two far more famous Rohan Jayasekeras on the Web. If you’re wondering who they are, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohan_Jayasekera . I cleaned up that part of Wikipedia myself even though I’m not mentioned, which seemed a bit unfortunate to me until I realized that there is actually an advantage for me here: those two more famous people are not particularly active on the Net. In particular, they don’t blog. (I’m a bit worried that one of them, the Associate Editor of Index on Censorship, might start blogging at some point, but I could have him bumped off and everyone would assume that it was done by someone upset by one of the controversies he's been involved in.) Also, RohanJayasekera.com is mine.

So I’m posting this as Rohan Jayasekera. It also appears that Blogger is retroactively identifying my previous posts that way (though not my comments on posts by others). Rewriting history is sometimes useful. Or, from another perspective, this is another instance where “history is written by the victors”.

We are their test market - make a difference


Coca-Cola to Open 'Coffee Shop' in Toronto: Report

Coca-Cola North America is reportedly launching a retail store in Canada that could be sticking a sharp elbow into Starbuck's coffee pots.

The beverage giant is reportedly opening a 4,000-square-foot retail space in Toronto to serve coffee-related products, a possible challenge to Starbucks, The Toronto Star reported Tuesday.

Officials at Coca-Cola could not be reached for comment.

Coca-Cola dipped its toe into the coffee market with the introduction of Coca-Cola Blak, which hit U.S. retail stores this week. The lightly carbonated, mid-calorie beverage is a blend of Coca-Cola, real coffee and natural flavors. It is designed to appeal to adults. The drink bowed in France and was expected to roll out across several other countries, as well as the U.S., this year.

If Coke's venture into the coffee-related retail market comes to fruition, it wouldn't be the first major player to do so. McDonald's already has its line of upscale coffee shops, called McCafés. It opened its first McCafé in 2003.

For more coverage on marketing at retail

4.4.06

Crocker's Rules

"Crocker's Rules" are named after Lee Daniel Crocker.

Declaring yourself to be operating by "Crocker's Rules" means that other people are allowed to optimize their messages for information, not for being nice to you. Crocker's Rules means that you have accepted full responsibility for the operation of your own mind - if you're offended, it's your fault. Anyone is allowed to call you a moron and claim to be doing you a favor. (Which, in point of fact, they would be. One of the big problems with this culture is that everyone's afraid to tell you you're wrong, or they think they have to dance around it.) Two people using Crocker's Rules should be able to communicate all relevant information in the minimum amount of time, without paraphrasing or social formatting. Obviously, don't declare yourself to be operating by Crocker's Rules unless you have that kind of mental discipline.

Note that Crocker's Rules does not mean you can insult people; it means that other people don't have to worry about whether they are insulting you. Crocker's Rules are a discipline, not a privilege. Furthermore, taking advantage of Crocker's Rules does not imply reciprocity. How could it? Crocker's Rules are something you do for yourself, to maximize information received - not something you grit your teeth over and do as a favor.

A friend just pointed me in the direction of this definition. I was amused because I have been operating this way for a few decades now but without realizing someone else had coined it as a methodology.

Personally I like it as a system of interaction and communication. It is clear on where responsibility lies and it facilitates a more honest interaction.

The problems I come up against are two fold, one is educating others, not everyone is ready to communicate this way, they are too conditioned to sugar coat and work within the so called expected "niceties" of our society.
The other is the conditioning of oneself, recognizing that your reactions are your own responsibility, does not always negate the fact that you may react...in a negative manner.
It is wonderful to have enough consciousness to observe your own reaction and to take the steps to alter it. But personally I am far from perfect and I still react to people and situations and will outwardly show my emotions.
This can result in a feedback loop. The person communicating in the open and honest manner experiences the reaction, wants to avoid the same reaction in the future and reverts back to a more insidious method of interaction.

What is you favorite method of social interaction?

2.4.06

Late April Fool's Post

Perfectly matched.
(Thanks to Cathie from Canada)

The Israeli Lobby

And while I'm posting links. -- One of the facts of Foreign Policy in both US and Canada is the disproportionate support Israel receives, both in foreign aid and (in the case of the United States) military aid.
This article in the London Review of Books by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, "both distinguished, globally respected public intellectuals -- the former at the University of Chicago and the latter at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government --" tries to examine the sources and origins of that support.
(Thanks to Steve C. Clemons of The Washington Note)

Unitarian Jihad

Jon Carroll at the San Francisco Chronical helps put it all into perspective here.
I may change my handle to Brother Neutron Bomb of Serenity.